16/11/2001
by Celso Fioravante
Brazilian contemporary art has just come to the end of a cycle
in its history with the closing on the 16th of August of the Camargo
Vilaça gallery in Sao Paulo. The gallery, founded on the 7th
of May 1992 by Karla Meneghel Ferraz de Camargo and Marcantonio Vilaça
(who passed away on the 1st of January 2000), helped strengthen the
role of Brazilian contemporary art on the international scene by promoting professionalism
and competitiveness.
Now the fruits of the gallery’s work will be reaped by the new Fortes Vilaça
gallery which was opened on the 16th of August in the same exhibition
space by Márcia Fortes and Alessandra Vilaça. An exhibition featuring
the work of Efrain Almeida was staged especially for the occasion, presenting
eight drawings and five small wood sculptures touching on autobiographical and
religious themes.
When the gallery opened its doors, there was a good deal of curiosity regarding
the range of artists that would be represented. The list of artists inherited
from the previous management, which include the likes of Ernesto Neto, Valeska
Soares, Iran do Espírito Santo, Vik Muniz, Adriana Varejão, José
Damasceno and Leda Catunda, was lengthened by the arrival of Janaina Tschäpe,
Tiago Carneiro da Cunha, Maurício Dias and Walter Reidweg. However, seven
artists did leave the gallery: Miguel do Rio Branco, Jac Leirner, José
Resende, Paulo Pasta, Laura Vinci, Mônica Rubinho and Maurício
Ruiz. The reasons for their departure were clearly encapsulated by Jac Leirner:
"I stood by the gallery in the transition period out of respect for the
years in which I worked with Marcantonio. Now I am leaving because I do not
feel comfortable working with those whom have taken his place: my relationship
with him was personal". Leirner is in fact in the process of joining the
André Viana gallery that should open in March 2002 in Sao Paulo.
In line with the new business plan, which involves a downsizing of operations
with cuts to personnel and lower budgets, the Fortes Vilaça gallery will
reduce the number of exhibitions it holds in Brazil as well as its participation
in international fairs. "We want to concentrate more on the work of each
artist to promote it more carefully – said Alessandra Vilaça. "In
order to do this we need more time, and so have decided to reduce the yearly
exhibitions from ten to eight. We will not be participating in more than four
or five fairs, especially given that the major galleries take part in only two
or three fairs each year".
The change in management at the gallery has been well received by both collectors
and gallerists in Sao Paulo. In the opinion of the collector José Olympio
Pereira, for example, the biggest trauma for the market was the death of Marcantonio
Vilaça, while the consequences are inevitable. The collector Isabella
Prata adds: "Any change in the art world must be seen in an optimistic
light, as it points to a market that is reacting. If, however, the gallery had
been definitively closed, it would have created an uncertain climate that would
have taken a heavy toll on the market". Gilberto Chateaubriand, one of
the world’s most famous collectors, believes that the change will not create
uncertainty in Brazil as people with experience of the art market
will work in the new gallery. "The line of work remains the same as that
traced by Marcantonio Vilaça, with strong investments on the foreign
market aimed at giving visibility to Brazilian artists," says Chateaubriand.
"The work of the new management on the Brazilian market can only be gauged
over time."
Even the competition appears to be unperturbed. "I am sure the change will
be for the good" – says the gallerist André Millan. "The market
will benefit from the reshuffle of artists and redistribution of economical
resources. Miguel Rio Branco joining my gallery for example, will give us much
more visibility, both in Brazil and abroad". Fábio Cimino, partner
of the Brito Cimino gallery, is enthusiastic about the changes: "I believe
these are natural and positive developments. The death of Marcantonio, who was
able to create a very personal relationship with each artist and took sole responsibility
for decision-making, has of course led to some changes. Maintaining continuity
would not have been possible".
|